Protests Then and Now–Protests of the 60s, about Peace and Love?

The protests of the 1960s, which continued into the mid-1970s focused on two issues: the unpopular war in Vietnam and the civil rights movements.  The purposes of the protests were clearly articulated and very specific.  Protesters opposed the draft, the war and inequality based on race, sex and class.

The protestors were often college students and young professionals.  They attended class, took exams, held responsible jobs.  On weekends and after hours they demonstrated.  While there were glaring exceptions to the norm, most protests were peaceful and most protesters went home to their own beds at night.  Despite being unpopular among parents, the police, and many educational and government officials, the response to these protests was generally reserved.

The deaths of 4 students at Kent State, May 4, 1970, at the hands of the National Guard, was perhaps the most tragic event associated with the peace movement.  The deaths of 4 African-American children in the Atlanta church, Sept. 15, 1963; the lynching of 3 civil rights workers involved in voter registration in Mississippi; involved in voter registration June 21, 1964; and the assassination of Martin Luther King, in Tennessee, April 4 1968, are the most often remembered deaths of the Civil Rights movement, but they do not stand alone.

Most demonstrations were peaceful.  Protesters marched, congregated in parks, on university campuses, and occasionally near military bases and government buildings.  They lit candles and bonded together.  They attended rock concerts like Woodstock and Cornstalk[1] where much of the music focused on peace, equality and empowerment.   But as much as memories of those who participated in those protests focus on commitment to love, peace, music and equality, some protesters turned violent.  Splinter groups, including the Weathermen, a faction of Students for a Democratic Society, developed radical agendas, called for violent revolution, became involved in criminal activities, took over university buildings and bombed banks and government buildings.

The Paris Peace Accords of 1973 ended U.S. military involvement in Vietnam.  All U.S. soldiers left Vietnam by 1975.  College campus calmed and the peace demonstrations came to an end.  The civil rights movement was transformed from protest marches to structured organizations over a period of time.  Cool heads would differ as to whether the protests caused the integration of schools, buses, restaurants, with the passage and enforcement of legislation.  However, there is no doubt that key legislation occurred almost simultaneously with the protests, including the passage and enforcement of laws such as Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1964 as amended in 1972, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex and national origin; and Title IX, which prohibits discrimination in education on the basis of sex.

It was a time of love and hate, peace and violence, equality and class/racial struggles; but the times they were a changing!


[1] Seriously, Cornstalk was a big event in rural Kansas.

The Challenge of Illegal Drugs

Meeting the Challenge of Illegal Drugs

Planes, trains and automobiles. What about submarines, buses and cargo ships? Drugs enter the United States through all these forms of transportation. Revenues from illegal drugs worldwide are estimated at $300 billion dollars. In the United States alone, estimated revenues totally $60 billion dollars. This is 13 billion dollars more than the budget of Michigan and 23 billion dollars more than the combined budgets of Kansas and Missouri. The wealth attributed to individual dealers is staggering; one Britain convicted of multiple drug related crimes, is reported to be worth $300 million dollars. He started life as a bouncer!

When my generation thinks of drugs, too many remember the comparatively easy summers of the 60’s and 70’s. If PCP, methamphetamine and cocaine were around, I never heard about it. Marijuana, the drug of choice on many college campuses, could be found in a farmer’s field or purchased from a college classmate. The hippie generation joked about twinkies, grew up, found jobs, raised families and seemed to leave drugs behind.

Fast forward 40 years. The issue of illegal drugs is serious business and we need to be serious about how we respond. The economics of dealing drugs at the local level are discussed by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, in their book, Freakonomics, chapter 3, Why Do Drug Dealers Still Live with their Moms?The authorsstudiedstreet dealers, ie. “foot soldiers” and concluded that most live at home because their average earnings are below minimum wage for jobs in which the chances of being killed are 1 in 4 . Contrast that to vast sums of money are controlled by international cartels that receive the real profits from drugs. Where does that money go and how is it spent?

A very rough estimate is that annually $10 billion to $30 billion dollars is smuggled South of the border. That money is used to pay those who harvest and/or manufacture drugs; to pay those who transport and sell drugs; to bribes government officials, lavish lifestyles for the drug lords, and terrorism. Terrorism in narrower sense involves funding drug traffickers/terrorists in Afghanistan and throughout that region; terrorism in the broader sense includes the destruction of whole communities in the border towns of Mexico, as well as the violence in the drug communities of our cities.

Drug sales and use sap the life out of our communities, primarily in some neighborhoods within our inner cities. The slogan “an unarmed drug dealer is a dead drug dealer” is more than a slogan. Those engaged in the drug trade too often protect themselves, their drugs and their money with violence, placing themselves, their neighbors and their families at risk of injury or death. The fear of violence and the risk that children will become involved in the drug trade further traumatizes some communities. Inner city street dealers are, in this and all regards, both victims and perpetrators.

So, the question is, what do we do about it? I haven’t a clue. But in the next months I hope to focus my research on various related issues in the hope that I will at least gain a better understanding. I will let you know what I learn.

U.S. role in world affairs, pt. 1: Zakaria’s Post-American World

Meg was home unexpectedly this weekend.  It gave us the opportunity to chat
about many of our favorite topics.  We talked about what it means that the
U.S. is pulling our troops out of Iraq.  How does this impact our image
with friendly and not so friendly governments?  We talked about what it is
that makes us unique.  We talked about our court system, our educational
system, our Constitution and Bill of Rights.  All of these are subjects we
want to talk about in our blog. But as I was struggling with how to share
our ideas, I was reminded of a book I consider to be worth reading.  It is
Fareed Zakaria’s book titled Post-American World, written in 2008.  While
focused on the period before President Obama took office, it remains relevant
today.

In his book, Zakaria talks about the changing role of the United States in
light of the “Rise of the Rest,” particularly resulting from the explosion
of prosperity in China and India.  He describes this “rise” as the most recent power shift of the modern history. First, it was the rise of the west (Western Europe), then the rise of the United States. Now, it’s the rise of the rest of the world, something he describes as leading us to the Post-American World. He talks about our strengths and
challenges as we face this change.  He discusses the rich
contributions from our immigrant populations, particularly in terms of our
technological development, and our related continued leadership in various
areas of technology.  He addresses our role in diplomacy, and notes the
importance of compromise, strategic relationships and innovation.

A significant challenge to which he repeatedly returns is his concern that
we have what he refers to as dysfunctional politics, something that prevents us from
forming clear solutions to our internal economic and various other challenges.

Zakaria doesn’t have all the answers, and you certainly may not agree
with many of his opinions, but it is hard to read his book without grasping
some sense of the challenges we face as a nation in this ever-changing
world.